Liaobu Dongguan LED street lamp project is facing two bidding embarrassment

Nanfang Daily for the first time due to the existence of irregularities in the bidding process, the "town center LED Liaobu street reconstruction and maintenance (EMC) project" (purchase code: LB201301) (hereinafter referred to as "Liaobu LED Street project") facing the two bidding embarrassment.

Recently, the Dongguan Municipal Bureau of Finance survey found after receiving the tender units complaint, Liaobu LED Street project because of the requirements of bidders in the assessment process to modify the tender price, in violation of the relevant government procurement regulations, be ordered to carry out procurement activities. This is also the first time this year, the city has been open to re procurement of government procurement projects.

Questioned the violation of the evaluation process bidding invalid

Liaobu LED street lamp project commissioned by the Liaobu municipal water affairs center commissioned by the Liaobu municipal government procurement center government procurement. Project on February 22, 2013 issued a procurement announcement, during the release of Clarification Announcement on May 30th. As of 14:30 on June 14th to stop bidding, the project a total of 5 suppliers to participate in the tender. The evaluation committee review, sorted by the total score, China Aviation Day Xu Hengyuan Energy Technology Co. Ltd. as the successful candidate.

After the announcement of the results of the evaluation, in June 15th, one of the bidding units Guangdong RONG Wen energy science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Rong company") to the Liaobu town government procurement center complaints, questioned the evaluation process.

The rongwen company, the project overall energy saving rate is calculated as LED / actual power (the original lamp power +20% power loss) -1, according to the bidding situation of all bidders, such all bidders rate all error, should be invalid standard treatment; secondly, in the project review process, the review committee to tender file is not clear overall energy saving rate and the overall benefits of energy saving is calculated as the reason, according to the requirements the exact statistical method to calculate the total energy saving rate and total energy gains, and to correct the original offer, the relevant provisions of the violation of government procurement. Based on the above reasons, the company believes that the company should be deemed to be invalid.

As the complaining party, Liaobu town government procurement center responded that the detailed calculation method is not explicitly given the energy-saving rate and total energy saving benefits of the project in the tender documents, and different calculation methods above each bidder in the tender of two kinds of data, in order to open and fair and accurate rate of each of the tendering units and energy saving the total energy gains, after discussion by the Vetting Committee, agreed to the requirements of the bidding site using the "exact statistical method", unified calculation of energy saving rate of the bidders and the corrected total energy gains, and submitted in writing to the review committee, as the effective basis for price calculation.

Liaobu town government procurement center believes that these practices in line with the relevant provisions of government procurement. At the same time, the whole project bidding, bidding process in full compliance with relevant laws and regulations, there is no illegal phenomenon.

Investigation and adjustment of energy efficiency has changed the content of the bid

June 28th, the company on the project bid evaluation process again complained to the Municipal Finance Bureau, the Municipal Finance Bureau immediately launched the investigation process.

Through the investigation and verification of the above matters, Municipal Finance Bureau believes that according to the bidding document page seventeenth energy saving index requirements, the energy saving rate calculation method: LED / actual power (the original power of sodium lamp +20% power loss) -1 "shall be the formula of single LED lamp energy saving rate. Therefore, the City Finance Bureau for the company believes that the formula is the formula for the overall energy efficiency formula, the calculation of all bidders should be invalid for the calculation of energy efficiency invalid statement does not support.

Secondly, the jury considered that the detailed calculation method is not explicitly given the overall saving rate and overall efficiency gains in the project bidding documents in the assessment process, which requires the clarification, use "exact statistical method" to calculate the overall energy saving rate and total energy gains, and to adjust the price for grading. After a recount, among the 5 companies involved in the bidding, there are 3 companies originally reported on energy saving rate has been adjusted, there is a company for such data can not provide timely and accurate reconstruction would be willing to give up the price score.

Municipal Finance Bureau believes that the above behavior review committee has substantially changed the quotation of bidders, in violation of the "government procurement of goods and services tender and bid management approach" (Ministry of Finance Decree No. eighteenth) the provisions of paragraph second of fifty-fourth.

Based on the above research results, that the Municipal Finance Bureau, the project evaluation committee during the review process requires the modification of the tender price in violation of relevant provisions of the government procurement, in order to make the project to re organize the government procurement activities.