Why is LED government subsidies a mistake?

BDO Runda chairman Wang Donglei had said such remarks: "although the government subsidies are still continuing, but the strength and intensity of subsidies are reduced. If there is no government subsidies, will have an impact on corporate profits, but to the healthy development of enterprises, can early rely on government subsidies, and for long-term business enterprise of little significance, and ultimately to self-reliance. 2013, the lighting industry, government subsidies is definitely a hot topic. Sanan optoelectronics, Elec-Tech, HC semitek, Mason technologies, different degree of benefit from government subsidies to the river carp, Sanan optoelectronics 3 years have been subsidized by the governments of provinces, cities and counties of more than 3 billion yuan allocated to hold the event.

At the beginning of 2014, many companies have announced the receipt of foreign governments at all levels of financial subsidies, funding information. As of January 29th, a subsidiary of Xiamen Sanan optoelectronics received Xiamen Siming District government allocated MOCVD equipment including 4 sets of four cavity piece machine 30% subsidy 24 million yuan; REFOND February 12th evening announcement, the company recently received the Shenzhen Municipal Finance Committee allocated funds 4 million 950 thousand yuan; Xinhai subsidiary of Suzhou nanojoin photonics received on February 13th "industrial park of Suzhou science and Technology Bureau, Finance Bureau issued on the Suzhou Industrial Park, 2014 year science and technology development funds notice", the new "nano crystal bear high brightness GaN based semiconductor lighting wafer, chip technology research" project to give 30 million yuan subsidy......

From 2013 to 2014, the government introduced a subsidy policy has attracted controversy. Insiders believe that, at this stage is in a critical period of domestic LED lighting to cope with the market reform, the national introduction of policies to support the LED lighting industry, the decentralized part of the subsidy funds, can effectively help enterprises to survive, help its rapid development; also has the rapid development of lighting people proposed government subsidies incentive in the LED industry, but excessive subsidies to support, on one hand the enterprises out of the market acumen, affecting the orderly market competition; on the other hand also resulted from the actual "push" phenomenon, and the breeding of cheat up events. In addition, the government subsidy preference for large enterprises and leading enterprises, small and medium-sized enterprises is difficult to have a cup of soup.

LED government subsidies is a serious mistake

LED government subsidies is a serious mistake, why do you say so?

First, LED government subsidies is a serious directional error, is the name of energy saving and emission reduction under the guise of creating another GDP government performance. More than and 10 years ago, it was demonstrated that the energy-saving lamps serious pollution of the environment, but a wide range of promotion, and a large number of energy-saving lamps containing mercury in the end after being discarded as ordinary garbage, bring risks to the environment pollution. An energy saving lamp can pollute 90-180 tons of groundwater and soil, 0.5 mg of mercury volatilization can pollute the air of 300 cubic meters, a single inhalation of 2.5 grams of mercury vapor that caused death. Water resources by mercury pollution, human and other animal after drinking will cause chronic poisoning, medicine called "Minamata disease".

In the Pearl River Delta region, originally green fruits and vegetables, healthy poultry, but now have been seriously polluted. Just a sampling of soil, a cup of water, can be found in mercury pollution. There are even brand-name enterprises will be secretly dumped in the Pearl River and farm land, resulting in serious pollution of farmland in Guangdong heavy metal. According to the relevant departments of the Pearl River Delta soil testing results show that heavy metals in the soil exceeded. The heavy metal elements with large area pollution are mainly toxic elements such as cadmium, mercury, arsenic, copper, and lead, chromium, zinc, nickel and other harmful elements.

While blaming food safety and environmental pollution, we continue to produce more serious pollution. This approach will undoubtedly give their offspring and leave for the future, the lighting industry almost everyone aware of the seriousness of pollution, but the collective "refusing to sell adorable! Lighting industry most people know, environmentalists have been concerned about, LED chip still exists serious environmental pollution and light pollution, the main raw material of sapphire chip is non renewable resources this double, the seriousness of pollution than the energy saving and emission reduction, more harm than good!

Therefore, the correct direction of government subsidies, the first is to manage the environment has been polluted, put an end to re amplification of pollution, and never again wrong decision-making, the creation of new pollution. We can no longer tolerate a lie to cover another lie!

Second, LED government subsidies severely broken the fair competition in the market order. If China wants to go to the world, it is necessary to set up an open global market. Therefore, regardless of the size of enterprises and countries, should be in a fair, open and fair business rules, with the strength of fair competition, the government should maintain and supervise the market order, and should not favour one more than another.

Third, LED government subsidies are corrupt soil". The power take taxpayer money, do everything possible to find bad temptations and greedy entrepreneurs, making false statements of material, packaging project subsidies The name falls short of the reality., exaggerated social benefits. This approach has corrupted many people, and even affected the commercial values of emerging entrepreneurs. Finally, in this appeal: but also the people of a clean living environment, but also a large number of small and medium enterprises Fair market.

Government subsidies to weaken the market to play a greater role

Teyoushi photoelectric science and technology director Yin Kang

In the early stage of the development of LED lighting, government subsidies on the upstream chip industry guidance and support has been achieved. present