Subsidies may give the wrong force to promote the response of the LED industry medicine

2009, the Yangzhou municipal government launched the MOCVD subsidy policy, making other local governments in China have followed suit, the whole of China set off a wave of investment in LED factory boom, this thing is still vivid. It is reported that Yangzhou, a MOCVD platform of financial subsidies to ten million yuan, this policy is much temptation for LED enterprises, and Yangzhou city is the "innovation" of subsidies, cash payment, the machine in place after the 50% of subsidy, subsidy of 30% during the trial period, the testing phase of mass production to provide the last 20% retainage subsidies. Therefore, attracted canyuan photoelectric, photoelectric, Blaupunkt, neo-neon Longyao photoelectric number LED epitaxial wafer manufacturers in Yangzhou. However, this is a good policy makes the survival of enterprises by increasing subsidies, subsidies in Yangzhou in July 2011 came to an end.

Rely on subsidies can feed enterprises, this argument has some truth, it is well known that the number of government subsidies with a tricky". "Sour grapes", many did not get subsidies LED enterprise heart began to doubt, got in the end subsidies, those enterprises in the expansion and development, or as a "pocket money" spend it can make nothing of it?. LED development so far, the introduction of the policy subsidies one by one, from the upstream equipment to the downstream procurement applications readily available. If the huge financial subsidy policy is terminated, what kind of situation will be faced by the subsidized enterprises? It is certain that some of the loss of subsidies after the company's earnings worrying.

It is understood that the Guangdong province established 2 billion yuan of Industrial Development Fund; Shenzhen to participate in government investment project LED demonstration project of enterprise, according to the lamp price to give 10% of the grant, and discount for 3 years, to undertake the enterprise investment project LED application demonstration project of enterprises, give subsidies according to the price of the 30% LED lamp. So Guangdong LED enterprises quickly launched, the traditional lighting companies are almost turned into the LED industry. Shows how amazing the power of government subsidies. Of course, financial subsidies to accelerate the development of the LED industry is beyond doubt, but also more and more close to the price of LED lamps civilian price".

In fact, the current government subsidy program is an important guarantee for LED corporate earnings, once the government stopped providing financial assistance to the current profitability, these LED companies are difficult to effectively respond to. LED industry to a certain extent, rely on policy driven, in which the highest financial support. The development of LED enterprise subsidies more better, but without policy support, subsidized LED enterprises would begin to shrink, this is just a "addict" to similar opium situation? Without subsidies expressed, originally a small enterprise is independent, the subsidy policy help the little effect is not significant. Financial subsidies have been "selfless" illness, let LED industry market cold, heat, and then blindly subsidies, local government financial resources is gradually exhausted sooner or later. So, whether the government subsidies to the wrong force?

Usually the government subsidies for bidding, LED lighting companies will benefit from the first, and subsequent packaging and chip manufacturers will also receive joint effects. Access to policy subsidies are large enterprises, investment in the size and strength of the enterprise is the most secure approach. Investment risks, of course, to choose the most stable corporate investment targets. But the LED industry is an emerging industry, few companies can be said to be the "old brand", because of this, small enterprises dared to Chong, the development of space. Unfortunately, these potential stocks have not been favored by the government. Serious polarization of the LED industry, including government subsidies blind is also one of the reasons.

LED companies get subsidies of course scenery, think the government should continue to carry out different projects on the industry subsidies. Subsidies can not get the only look at the enterprise, subsidies for its dispensable. The industry believes that government subsidies understandable, but the choice of the path is a problem. Such as a few years ago, under the guidance of the government, the first wave of enterprises mostly produce LED street lamp, when the LED street lamp application promotion is the earliest and largest international. At that time, the quality of the LED street lamps can be seen in the hearts of everyone, this is the first blind subsidies, but not the last one. Do not look for the market, looking for mayor, the slogan became popular, the government strongly support the LED industry, but because of technical conditions are not ripe, the product can not be extended to a larger market. Finally, government procurement has become the only sales channel for LED enterprises. This is not the LED industry led to a dead end it?

Experts said that the policy subsidy should be people-oriented, to take consumers to buy LED lights for the corresponding subsidies, so that the high price of LED lights gradually accepted by consumers. But the government should learn from the early energy-saving lamps Huimin subsidies, because of the public awareness is not in place, the subsidy policy". People do not know where to buy, do not know where the consultation, so that energy-saving lamps "raised in purdah did not know". The current LED reconstruction project is a good way to deepen people's awareness of energy conservation, such as to take the public to buy LED lights for the corresponding subsidies, procurement and consulting website must be complete, so as to speed up the popularity of LED.