Shenzhen Consumer Council issued a comparative test report energy-saving lamps

Abstract: how to Shenzhen market energy-saving lamp energy saving lamp quality? Shenzhen City Council yesterday released a report on comparative test may give you some answers. There are 19 samples in the power, interchangeability and other projects in varying degrees exist in line with the relevant national standards or not meet the nominal value of the situation.

Shenzhen market, the quality of energy-saving lamps, Shenzhen City Council yesterday released a comparative test report energy-saving lamps may give you some answers. City Council 1 - March sales of energy-saving lamps on the market in Shenzhen

Comparison test, sampling 40 samples, found that these samples of anti electric shock protection, moisture insulation resistance and dielectric strength, mechanical strength, heat resistance, fire and fire all qualified. At the same time, there are 19 samples in the work

Rate, interchangeability and other projects in varying degrees exist in the state does not meet the relevant standards or not up to the nominal value of the situation. Some of the samples, such as ball lighting 13W, deep Pu Hui 20W, 31 star 5W and other projects less than

Standard.

Over 50% samples through all test items

Reporters learned that the 40 samples of the comparative test, all by the City Council staff and testing institutions in Shenzhen, a professional sampling of supermarkets, large home building materials stores to simulate the random purchase of ordinary consumers

Buy, samples involving Shanghai, Fujian, Guangdong, Chongqing, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, 6 provinces and cities of 26 companies, the price from $5.9 / only to 42 yuan / only. The comparative test commissioned by the city of Shenzhen quality measurement

Institute of the sample safety, performance, energy efficiency rating.

The test results show that 40 of the 21 samples through all the test items, accounting for the total number of samples of the other; the other 19 samples in power, interchangeability, power factor, energy efficiency level, Chu Shiguang, 52.5%

There are different levels of the project, such as flux, which do not meet the requirements of the relevant national standards or fail to reach the nominal value. The 40 samples of electric shock protection, insulation resistance and dielectric strength, mechanical strength, heat resistance,

Fire and fire all qualified.

This test has 2 samples without standard Chinese energy label, respectively: PKS 9W and QUSUN 7W paicos Johnson China; energy efficiency labeling and the actual product marked another 2 samples of packaging

Fu, were: Dibunch 13W and Fubon lighting 11W. For example: the product energy efficiency logo on behalf of the nominal energy-saving lamp color symbol for RD (yellow light) but the product is actually RR (white). City Council related person

Personnel, these are not in line with state regulations, will mislead consumers and inconvenience.

More than 30% samples are easy to cause safety accidents

In this test, 13 samples were not qualified, accounting for 32.5% of the total sample. Including: 20W, Diall8W, deep bothfine, popular 7W, PKS Flygt 9W, paicos Photipong

Odd 13W, - 9W, 31 in the popular flying star 5W, deep 7W, SHLY 8W, Pu Hui Lei Li 8W, Moore, Moore, 28W lighting 20W lighting 13W lighting.

The reporter understands, interchangeability is related to general lighting self ballasted fluorescent lamps is an important technical index of safe use, poor performance are prone to swap when the lamp cap is screwed in the lamp holder, the lamp cap and the lamp holder with the improper or caused by arc discharge, easy to cause safety accidents.

According to experts, the main reason of the swap test is a lamp factory mold size is not accurate, or soft cap materials lead to the assembly during deformation, and the energy-saving lamp manufacturer no quality control procedures and inspection ability effectively, unable to control the quality of parts.

15 sample lamp power failure

The test of 15 samples of the lamp power failure, accounting for 37.5% of the total number of samples. Including: deep bothfine 20W, and Dibunch 13W, the popular 7W Flygt, and 9W, 31 popular Feili home

Star 5W, lead 13W, beautiful lighting ball 9W, deep bothfine 7W, 8W, 20W ray Moore, Moore lighting, 28W lighting, electrical electrician 11W time time 18W, 11W, Falaike Fubon lighting

11W.

According to reports, the lamp power is the effective power consumption refers to the normal work, reflects the energy consumption index of the product sample, the test power failure are the actual power than the nominal power, such as Falaike 11W

The actual power 5.85W - 6.07W, only the nominal power of 53.2% - 55.2%, far below the standard requirements of not less than the nominal power of the requirements of "85%". Consumers can not meet the requirements of

Ming effect, so that the damage to the interests of consumers.

Experts said that the main reason is the deficiency of power energy-saving lamp energy saving lamp power is high, the price is higher, while ordinary consumers lack of professional tools to detect power, only by visual feeling, so the manufacturer deliberately low power lamp elevation power lamp factory sales, its purpose is to put the small power light sell high power price, profit more from.

10% the initial luminous efficiency of the sample is not up to the standard

This test has 4 samples of initial light effect does not meet the standard requirements, including: deep bothfine 20W, lead 13W, 31 ball lighting Star home 5W, Falaike 11W.

Reporters learned from the City Council, light efficiency is the ratio of luminous flux emitted by the lamp and the power consumption, while the luminous flux reflects the intensity of the light intensity of the light, so the light efficiency directly reflects whether the product is energy-saving. This item is not

The standard reflects the light effect of the sample is low or luminous intensity is not enough, can not reach the effect of saving energy and saving money. For example, the ball lighting 13W products, the standard requirements of the initial light effect is not less than 44lm/W, but the actual only

36.65lm/W - 41.60lm/W, does not meet the standard requirements.

According to experts, the initial light effect is not up to the standard energy-saving lamps are generally used halogen powder or mixed powder instead of three rare earth phosphors, or the use of inferior powder of the three primary colors. Some manufacturers cut corners, the use of poor quality components.

It is understood that there are 1 samples in this test, cited ball lighting 13W power factor does not meet the standard requirements. According to experts, the main reason of low power factor is the design components selection and circuit of electronic ballast is unreasonable, some manufacturers use inferior components lead to product performance can not reach the design level.

9 samples energy efficiency level is not up to standard

Energy efficiency rating did not meet the test of 9 batches of goods, including: deep bothfine 20W, - 7W, - fenic Flygt popular popular 9W, 31 Star home 5W, cited 13W, Moore lighting 28W lighting lamps, time 11W, time 18W, electrical electrician Falaike 11W.

According to reports, energy efficiency labeling is an indicator of the performance indicators such as product energy efficiency rating. The lower the number of energy efficiency labels, the more energy saving. Virtual standard energy efficiency level will mislead consumers, the same

Can not achieve the purpose of energy conservation. For example, 31 star 5W products, nominal energy efficiency level of 2, according to the national standard of its initial light effect is not less than 46lm/W, but only 29.84lm/W-

34.49lm/W, far from meeting the requirements, even China energy efficiency labeling requirements of 3, the initial light effect is not less than 36lm/W are not up to.

Experts said that the main reason for the energy efficiency level is not the energy efficiency labeling of low grade products are higher than the same level of high price. Some manufacturers use the virtual energy efficiency rating to seek higher profits.

City Council said that the results of the comparison test is only responsible for the test samples, does not represent the brand of other models, batches of product quality. Any units and enterprises without the approval of the Shenzhen Municipal Council, shall not use the results of the comparative test commercial propaganda, or as advertising content, otherwise it will pursue its legal responsibility.

Source: Nanfang Daily