Nearly one million yuan dashuipiao? Loss of a certain corporate trustee

As of yesterday (29), Shenzhen Mr. Huang has been in Xi'an for 4 days, but it is not clear. Equipment has been entrusted by the trustee, and the installation costs of goods and payment of more than one million yuan, and now the trustee but hide and seek, do not answer his phone, which makes Mr. Huang feel helpless.

The other received a LED screen and more than ten thousand installation fees, but lost contact before installation

"I put the value of about 900000 of the goods to his custody, and gave him dozen dozen construction costs, but he did not answer my phone. Mr. Huang is the general manager of Shenzhen, a lighting company in early 2014, their company contracted 3 large screen LED Xi'an goods supply and install, and the installation of the project entrusted to one had business relations with the guo. In the delivery of goods to Xi'an to Guo Mou, Mr. Huang to play more than 23 yuan of construction and installation fee. Two smaller smooth installation, the installation fee of 100 thousand yuan deducted from, but also left a value of more than 940 thousand yuan arc screen, to install in Changle West Road, white dress plaza. Mr Wong said, unfortunately encountered mall decoration, until April, when he contacted Kwak installation, but found that the other lost contact.

He did not answer the phone, send text messages do not return, I borrow someone else's phone call in the past, he turned on to hear that I immediately hang up. Mr. Huang feel very puzzled, their own goods plus the installation fee to call, has more than one million, but the other side suddenly ignore their own. Mr. Huang said, a week ago, he went to Henan to find Guo home, assisted by local police found Kwak Kwak said the parents, parents have not come home for a long time, the local police contact with Mr. Huang Guo to meet the thing to say, but Kwak is just on the phone to.

Seek help, ran a few times between the court and the police station

Long term can not find Guo, Mr. Huang said he had sent to Xi'an to report, but the police refused to file. January 26th, he personally came to Xi'an, to the Public Security Bureau of Changle Metro West police station, the police station replied that this is an economic dispute, inadmissible, and suggested that he went directly to the court. But when Mr. Huang came to the new city court, the court staff believe that the police should initiate an investigation. These days, I ran back and forth between the police station and the court several times, the two have not filed, I feel like a ball, kicked to kick. "

Yesterday morning, Changle Road police station director Shi Qiang said, Mr. Huang after the report, they had to consult the special branch of the legal department of the qualitative questions on the issue, the final set of economic disputes, do not constitute criminal case standards. "Guo does have the installation technology, between them also had indeed worked, Kwak still use their own identity and just don't answer the phone, Mr. Huang's phone, so does not constitute fraud, theft and elements of subjective intent, secret access is not set up, so does not constitute a criminal theft, he said the crime of fraud. This is an economic dispute, the court should find a lawsuit. "

The new district court two staff after listening to Mr. Huang described said if Mr. Huang wants to make the civil case, but if you can't find Kwak, their first legal documents served on a problem, then even if Mr. Huang can win the lawsuit, the subject of the case is also very difficult to perform, "the Guo Mou should offend the crime of embezzlement, has been suspected of criminal offenses, the public security departments should initiate an investigation. "Two staff members said.

At noon yesterday, Mr. Kwak said on the phone, Mr. Huang's equipment is indeed he withheld, he did receive the installation fee paid by Mr. Huang and other expenses, "but I detain the goods act on behalf of our company, the company's authorization, I just work here. Guo said that after the incident, Mr. Wong has repeatedly call, send text messages threatening him, he was in fear every day, and therefore dare not answer the phone.

Shaanxi Darui lawyer Zhang Haijun said, Guo Huang will not answer the phone, the LED screen is hiding, deforcement, suspected of embezzlement. "Criminal law" provisions of article 270th of the entrusted property illegally for himself, the larger amount, refusing to return, two years of fixed-term imprisonment, criminal detention or fines; a huge amount or other serious circumstances, at least two years to five years imprisonment and fined. So Mr. Huang still want to go to the police station to find a solution. "

For more information about LED, please click on China LED network or pay attention to WeChat public account (cnledw2013).